Twin Mirrored Engine Pairs - Eliminate Cause Drift - Concept 3D model
Home Catalog Twin Mirrored Engine Pairs - Eliminate Cause Drift - Concept 3D model

Publication date: 2023-12-23

Buy Twin Mirrored Engine Pairs - Eliminate Cause Drift - Concept 3D model

$7

License: Editorial No Ai

author:

Raqia-Design

All content related to this 3D asset—including renders, descriptions, and metadata — is credited to its original author, «Raqia-Design». CGhub does not claim copyright ownership over the content used.
  • Description
  • Formats

Twin Mirrored Engine Pair[s] - Eliminate Plane Drift Cause - Concept.

I was reading about early gyroscopes, and how they are supposed to detect and eliminate drift for planes, then i immediately was like, oh no, they didn't mirror the engine designs, to eliminate the CAUSE of drift to begin with??? what our luminary aero plane engineers did, was copy over the same exact engine, from the left wing to the right wing. if they had literally mirrored the planes complete engine designs, there would actually be zero drift..... we would have two centripetal forces, working inwards.

when both engines turn the exact same way, of course you get drift, a movement away from the intended center line. if both engines turned the other opposite way, no matter both inward, or outward, performing the same future, namely thrust, there would be no actual drift, at all. no simpleton aerospace engineer ever thought of mirroring the complete engine design for planes to eliminate the cause of this drift??? they then went on and invented a ring laser gyro, and auto pilot drift correcting systems, and sold the correctional method for billions.

counter rotating engines, eliminate any and all drift completely, eliminating the actual need for any such auto pilot correctional systems, enabling us to fly straighter for much longer, sans corrections, saving much on fuel economy as well as enabling us with straighter landings and take offs, increasing the safety overall during take off and landings of aero planes. balance is key... 2 engines need two actually physically different yet similar [mirrored design] motors on each wing. instead of moving over the same engine, we need to mirror the entire DNA of the engine, to counter any precession to a side, creating a difference in total overall angular momentum, influencing our flight path negatively, continuously during flight.

if you add a second mirrored pair, we could even use one or two pairs to take off, then switch one pair to generate electricity, all counter spinning, not causing any drift. one pair for thrust, one pair for generation of electricity from falling, just regenerating of a car, when braking. once we are at our highest point, and we used energy to get there, falling will occur, the falling will turn the rotors, the rotors can generate electricity. parabolic flights aren't even needed. we need to fly forward anyways, why not convert forward motion to electric energy, prolonging flight times, saving even more fuel.

i cant believe this only took man like a 150 years to come up with? seriously?

Electric Motors inside Airplane wheels, would save a lot of fuel during take off's, if they can assist in the speed buildup, while there is still grip and torque from contact with the surface...Perhaps during landing, on first contact they can regenerate some electricity as well. Perhaps they enable things like ABS for planes etc.

if you mirror the plane motors design, to have twin motors as a pair but mirrored in orientation, they would all counter spin and balance themselves out, removing any gyroscopic precession or drift. Straight would be straight for a long time without course corrections needed. Course corrections cost fuel. less corrections, less fuel usage.

This is why two turbo jets laying next to each other should both be counter spinning, fully mirrored in their Dna down to the part, in their design, for perfect balance in forces onto the craft.A steerable nose flap like the front of formula one car, might help a fighter plane turn much quicker, a much smaller radius turn. A amphibius plane could use electrical water jets in the tail and or belly for extra power, extra grip from additionally using the water, during take off, shortening the distance needed for getting air borne.

What year is this?

STL (Stereolithography, filesize: 11.7 MB), OBJ (OBJ, filesize: 12.1 MB), MAX (Autodesk 3ds Max, filesize: 1.08 MB), FBX (Autodesk FBX, filesize: 3.64 MB)

3D Model details

  • cgtrader Platform
  • Animated
  • Rigged
  • Ready for 3D Printing
  • VR / AR / Low-poly
  • PBR
  • Textures
  • Materials
  • UV Mapping
  • Polygons: 0
  • Vertices: 0
  • Geometry: No N-gons | No faceted geometry | Manifold geometry |